JERUSALEM -- Down the slope from the Old City's Dung
Gate, rows of thick stone walls, shards of pottery and other remains of
an expansive ancient building are being exhumed from a dusty pit.
The site is on a narrow terrace at the edge of the Kidron Valley, which
sheers away from the Old City walls, in a cliffside area the Bible
describes as the seat of the kings of ancient Israel.
What is taking shape in the rocky earth, marked by centuries of
conquest and development, is as contested as the neighborhood of Arabs
and Jews encircling the excavation. But Israeli archaeologist Eilat
Mazar believes the evidence she has uncovered during months of
excavation and biblical comparison points to an extraordinary discovery.
She believes she has found the palace of King David, the poet-warrior
who the Bible says consolidated the ancient Jewish kingdom around the
10th century B.C. and expanded its borders to encompass the land of
Israel. Others are doubtful.
"There is sometimes a reality, a very precise reality, though maybe
not all true, described in the Bible," Mazar said. "This is
giving the Bible's version a chance."
Mazar's find is emerging at the nexus of history, religion and politics,
volatile forces that have guided building, biblical scholarship and war
in Jerusalem for millenniums. Even before the findings have been
assembled in a scientific paper, the discovery is prompting new thinking
about when Jerusalem rose to prominence, the nature of the early Jewish
kingdom, and whether the Bible can be used as a reliable map to
archaeological discovery.
Only a small fraction of the structure has been exposed. But it is
yielding rare clues to the early development of Jerusalem, long debated
within Israel's university archaeology departments.
Some archaeologists believe Jerusalem was no more than a tiny hilltop
village when it served as David's capital. The discovery of a palace or
other large public building from David's time would strengthen the
opposing view that he and his son, Solomon, presided over a civilization
grander than the collection of rural clans some historians say made up
the Jewish kingdom.
Whether David was a tribal chieftain or visionary monarch matters deeply
to the Jewish historical narrative - the story of a single people, once
ruled by kings, and later dispossessed of its homeland until the modern
state of Israel was created nearly 2,000 years later after the horrors
of the Holocaust.
Palestinian leaders, who also claim Jerusalem as their capital, dismiss
the ancient story as politically useful fiction. But given the palace's
location on land Israel seized in the 1967 Middle East war, its
discovery could be used to bolster the Israeli claim to the East
Jerusalem neighborhood and increase Jewish settlement in the area.
The excavation, on land owned by a private organization that has been
moving Jewish settlers into the Arab neighborhood, is being funded by a
Jerusalem research institute that promotes policy to strengthen Israel's
Jewish character and by a wealthy American Jewish investor.
Prof. Israel Finkelstein of Tel Aviv University's Institute of
Archaeology said Mazar's interpretation should be understood as the
latest in a series of "messianic eruptions" designed to
bolster the image of David as a ruler of an important civilization, an
idea that has lost currency in recent years in part because of
Finkelstein's writing against it.
"That is why you are seeing this interpretation, to counter that
momentum against it," said Finkelstein, co-author of the book
"The Bible Unearthed: Archaeology's New Vision of Ancient Israel
and the Origin of Its Sacred Texts."
"It's an important find, and I'm not underestimating it," he
said. "But from what she has found to the palace of David is a big
distance."
SOURCE:
Article by SCOTT WILSON,
Washington Post |